Shh.
Thursday, March 8, 2012 at 10:27PM In her essay, "What Might Have Been," Jaime Cone recounts her experiences of learning the details of her birth mother's life. She was given a glimpse of what so many of us wonder about: what would we be like if we'd had different parents?
When she was 24, Cone's mother gave her a file folder full of information on her adoption and the time leading up to it. Many of Cone's discoveries were difficult ones. Her biological family's life was vastly different that her adoptive family's. Her mother struggled with apparent mental health issues, a fact that haunted Cone. In the end, Cone writes:
A part of me hates the file and wishes it never existed. But some bits I treasure, and I read them over as a mental salve when the rest of it leaves me feeling depressed. Not only does it help me understand my parents’ attitude toward my biological family, it reminds me of how truly lucky I am: how my life could have been different had my adoptive parents not endured years of uncertainty and stressful battles in trying to legally make me their child.
Often we are told that the truth will set us free. But are there ever times when that is not the case? When facts cloud or obfuscate our understanding? Consider Cone's experience of increasing self doubt after reading about her mother's instability. Are there things we are better off not knowing?
Many times, after learning a hard truth, that a partner has cheated, or a parent has lived a lie, we feel that we are better off knowing the truth. But are we?
Is silence ever best?
Tom Seidmann Freud (nee Martha Freud), 1912










